Openings › Italian Game › Italian Game: Two Knights Defense
Results by level
Italian Two Knights Defense: Win Rate by Lichess Rating
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense · 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 · CC0 name list
At 1500–1799 (Lichess rating), Black scored 47.8% in 22,112 Italian Game: Two Knights Defense games (±0.6; games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026).
Black won 46.1% of them, White won 50.5%, and 3.4% were drawn.
Black scores below 50% at this level (outside the margin)
In games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026, Black scored 47.8% (±0.6) with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense in sampled Lichess games at the 1500–1799 Lichess rating level (22,112 games). Observed results, not causation.
Data period: games from 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026 (sample of the Lichess open database) · Page updated: 9 Oct 2026
48.9%
Black's score at Lichess rating 1800–2099 · 12,547 games, Oct 2025–Sep 2026 sample
Black scores 48.9% at 1800–2099 and 45.7% under 1200.
At a glance
- In this sample, White's score ranged from 49.8% (2100+) to 54.3% (Under 1200).
- Treat this spread with caution: the margins are approximate (see How it works).
- It appeared most often in the Under 1200 group (2.4% of that group's games).
- Draws were most common in the 2100+ group (6.9%).
These are observed results for the selected games (rated, players within 200 rating points of each other). They describe what happened — they do not prove the opening caused the result.
Results by Lichess rating level
Each row shows how the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense games at one rating level ended: White wins, draws and Black wins, across all time controls combined. Rating level is the average Lichess rating of both players.
White won drawn Black won. Italian Game: Two Knights Defense — results by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined (minimum 300 games per row).
"White's score" = wins + half of draws. "±" is an approximate 95% margin based only on the number of games. It does not cover sampling bias or related games (the same players appear many times), so real uncertainty is larger. "How common" = share of all sampled games at that level that reached this position. Ratings are Lichess ratings; they are not interchangeable with Chess.com or FIDE ratings.
Compare it with another choice from the same position, at the Lichess level and time control you choose: Compare in Find Your Opening (the comparison needs JavaScript)
Results by time control
Each row shows how the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense games ended in one Lichess time control, across all rating levels combined.
| Time control | Games | White wins | Draws | Black wins | White's score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bullet | 19,902 | 50.7% | 2.3% | 47.0% | 51.8% |
| Blitz | 40,181 | 51.0% | 3.6% | 45.3% | 52.8% |
| Rapid | 22,426 | 51.1% | 4.2% | 44.7% | 53.2% |
| Classical | 788 | 49.2% | 4.6% | 46.2% | 51.5% |
This table and the rating rows are separate summaries: rating levels are not split by time control here, and time controls are not split by rating. Observed results only; approximate uncertainty applies as above.
Most played replies for White at each level
Top replies with at least 150 games. "Score" is White's score after that reply (wins + half of draws). These comparisons alone can't show that one reply is reliably better — the margins are approximate and stronger or weaker players may prefer different replies.
| Rating level | Reply · share · games · score |
|---|---|
| Under 1200 |
4.Ng5 ·34.1% · 6,807 · 57.0% ±1.2 4.d3 ·26.7% · 5,320 · 52.7% ±1.3 4.Nc3 ·20.3% · 4,040 · 53.7% ±1.5 |
| 1200–1499 |
4.d3 ·31.4% · 7,651 · 52.9% ±1.1 4.Ng5 ·30.9% · 7,543 · 54.2% ±1.1 4.Nc3 ·17.9% · 4,358 · 52.1% ±1.5 |
| 1500–1799 |
4.d3 ·33.0% · 7,284 · 51.8% ±1.1 4.Ng5 ·26.9% · 5,941 · 52.5% ±1.2 4.Nc3 ·16.1% · 3,559 · 50.9% ±1.6 |
| 1800–2099 |
4.d3 ·37.0% · 4,648 · 51.7% ±1.4 4.Ng5 ·24.8% · 3,109 · 51.8% ±1.7 4.O-O ·12.7% · 1,594 · 50.9% ±2.4 |
| 2100+ |
4.d3 ·46.6% · 1,997 · 50.3% ±2.1 4.Ng5 ·23.2% · 992 · 49.7% ±3.0 4.d4 ·11.0% · 470 · 49.6% ±4.3 |
Up next: related positions with a page
- Earlier position: Italian Game 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4
- Deeper line: Fried Liver Attack 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nxd5 6.Nxf7
- Deeper line: Traxler Counterattack 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5
- Related line: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 (King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation)
- Related line: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 (Philidor Defense)
- Related line: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 (Petrov's Defense)
| Opening | Lichess rating level | Games | Black's score |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs Italian Game: Giuoco Piano 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 | 1500–1799 | 21,984 | 48.6% ±0.6 |
Each row is a separate page with its own games. A difference smaller than the two margins combined is no clear difference. Observed results, not causation.
Deeper positions with this name
The free opening list gives the name Italian Game: Two Knights Defense to 3 deeper positions on this line as well. This page counts the first one; games in the 12-month sample that reached each deeper one:
- 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Nxe4 5.Nxe4 d5: 3,509 games
- 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2: 617 games
- 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.O-O Bc5 5.d4 Bxd4 6.Nxd4 Nxd4 7.Bg5 d6: 41 games
Download these numbers: Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (CSV), released under CC0. For move-by-move exploration with your own filters, see the free Lichess opening explorer. This independent page lists each rating level and each time control in its own row for comparison.
- Insight pages whose tables include the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense: Score changes from Under 1200 to 2100+ · Most drawish openings
- How the numbers on this page are made: How it works