Rapport-Jobava System: Win Rate by Lichess Rating

Rapport-Jobava System · 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 · CC0 name list

At 1500–1799 (Lichess rating), White scored 54.4% in 5,496 Rapport-Jobava System games (±1.3; games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026).

White won 52.6% of them, Black won 43.8%, and 3.7% were drawn.

White scores above 50% at this level (outside the margin)

In games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026, White scored 54.4% (±1.3) with the Rapport-Jobava System in sampled Lichess games at the 1500–1799 Lichess rating level (5,496 games). Observed results, not causation.

Data period: games from 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026 (sample of the Lichess open database) · Page updated: 9 Oct 2026

0.4%

of rated games at Lichess rating 1200–1499 reached the Rapport-Jobava System · 4,705 of 1,195,994 games, Oct 2025–Sep 2026 sample

At 1800–2099: 0.3%. At 1200–1499: 0.4%. 1.3× as common at 1200–1499 as at 1800–2099.

Position after 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4. 19,385 games in this sample reached it — 7,091 of them by a different move order.

At a glance

In this sample, White's score ranged from 53.6% (2100+) to 56.6% (1200–1499).
Treat this spread with caution: the margins are approximate (see How it works).
It appeared most often in the Under 1200 group (0.4% of that group's games).
Draws were most common in the 2100+ group (5.8%).

These are observed results for the selected games (rated, players within 200 rating points of each other). They describe what happened — they do not prove the opening caused the result.

Results by Lichess rating level

Each row shows how the Rapport-Jobava System games at one rating level ended: White wins, draws and Black wins, across all time controls combined. Rating level is the average Lichess rating of both players.

White won drawn Black won. Rapport-Jobava System — results by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined (minimum 300 games per row).

Under 12003,063 games

White wins 54.8% · draws 3.5% · Black wins 41.8% · White's score 56.5% ±1.7 · how common 0.4%
1200–14994,705 gamesIn the headline

White wins 55.0% · draws 3.2% · Black wins 41.8% · White's score 56.6% ±1.4 · how common 0.4%
1500–17995,496 games

White wins 52.6% · draws 3.7% · Black wins 43.8% · White's score 54.4% ±1.3 · how common 0.3%
1800–20993,994 gamesCompared with

White wins 51.7% · draws 4.8% · Black wins 43.5% · White's score 54.1% ±1.5 · how common 0.3%
2100+2,127 games

White wins 50.7% · draws 5.8% · Black wins 43.5% · White's score 53.6% ±2.1 · how common 0.3%

"White's score" = wins + half of draws. "±" is an approximate 95% margin based only on the number of games. It does not cover sampling bias or related games (the same players appear many times), so real uncertainty is larger. "How common" = share of all sampled games at that level that reached this position. Ratings are Lichess ratings; they are not interchangeable with Chess.com or FIDE ratings.

See the replies most often played next at the Lichess level you choose, on one printable sheet: Prepare replies in Find Your Opening (the sheet needs JavaScript)

Results by time control

Each row shows how the Rapport-Jobava System games ended in one Lichess time control, across all rating levels combined.

Rapport-Jobava System — results by time control, all rating levels combined (minimum 300 games per row)
Time control	Games	White wins	Draws	Black wins	White's score
Bullet	5,072	54.3%	2.9%	42.8%	55.7%
Blitz	9,810	52.6%	4.3%	43.1%	54.8%
Rapid	4,346	52.7%	4.5%	42.8%	55.0%
Classical	157	Not enough games in this sample

This table and the rating rows are separate summaries: rating levels are not split by time control here, and time controls are not split by rating. Observed results only; approximate uncertainty applies as above.

Most played replies for Black at each level

Top replies with at least 150 games. "Score" is Black's score after that reply (wins + half of draws). These comparisons alone can't show that one reply is reliably better — the margins are approximate and stronger or weaker players may prefer different replies.

Replies to 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined
Rating level	Reply · share · games · score
Under 1200	3...Nc6 ·33.0% · 1,007 · 37.7% ±2.9 3...e6 ·18.6% · 569 · 46.7% ±4.0 3...Bf5 ·18.0% · 549 · 47.1% ±4.1
1200–1499	3...Nc6 ·23.2% · 1,093 · 36.6% ±2.8 3...e6 ·22.9% · 1,076 · 46.6% ±2.9 3...Bf5 ·20.6% · 969 · 41.3% ±3.1
1500–1799	3...e6 ·25.5% · 1,402 · 47.9% ±2.6 3...Bf5 ·20.3% · 1,115 · 46.7% ±2.9 3...Nc6 ·15.7% · 863 · 41.5% ±3.2
1800–2099	3...e6 ·24.5% · 977 · 45.9% ±3.1 3...Bf5 ·18.8% · 749 · 46.0% ±3.5 3...c6 ·16.3% · 651 · 44.9% ±3.7
2100+	3...e6 ·21.7% · 461 · 43.3% ±4.4 3...c6 ·19.6% · 416 · 46.9% ±4.6 3...a6 ·18.1% · 385 · 49.1% ±4.8

Up next: related positions with a page

Related line: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 (Queen's Gambit)
Related line: 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 (Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation)
Related line: 1.d4 d5 2.Bf4 (London System)
Related line: 1.d4 d5 2.e4 (Blackmar-Diemer Gambit)

Deeper positions with this name

The free opening list gives the name Rapport-Jobava System to 2 deeper positions on this line as well. This page counts the first one; games in the 12-month sample that reached each deeper one:

1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 e6: 8,728 games
1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 g6: 1,310 games

Download these numbers: Rapport-Jobava System (CSV), released under CC0. For move-by-move exploration with your own filters, see the free Lichess opening explorer. This independent page lists each rating level and each time control in its own row for comparison.