Openings › Sicilian Defense › Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation
How common by level
Sicilian Dragon Variation: Win Rate by Lichess Rating
Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation · 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 · CC0 name list
At 1500–1799 (Lichess rating), Black scored 46.5% in 1,025 Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation games (±3.0; games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026).
Black won 44.5% of them, White won 51.4%, and 4.1% were drawn.
Black scores below 50% at this level (outside the margin)
In games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026, Black scored 46.5% (±3.0) with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation in sampled Lichess games at the 1500–1799 Lichess rating level (1,025 games). Observed results, not causation.
Data period: games from 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026 (sample of the Lichess open database) · Page updated: 9 Oct 2026
0.3%
of rated games at Lichess rating 2100+ reached the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation · 1,903 of 689,970 games, Oct 2025–Sep 2026 sample
At 1200–1499: 0.0%. At 2100+: 0.3%. 9.3× as common at 2100+ as at 1200–1499.
At a glance
- In this sample, White's score ranged from 46.6% (1200–1499) to 53.5% (1500–1799).
- Treat this spread with caution: the margins are approximate (see How it works).
- It appeared most often in the 2100+ group (0.3% of that group's games).
- Draws were most common in the 2100+ group (6.5%).
These are observed results for the selected games (rated, players within 200 rating points of each other). They describe what happened — they do not prove the opening caused the result.
Results by Lichess rating level
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation games at one rating level ended: White wins, draws and Black wins, across all time controls combined. Rating level is the average Lichess rating of both players.
White won drawn Black won. Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation — results by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined (minimum 300 games per row).
"White's score" = wins + half of draws. "±" is an approximate 95% margin based only on the number of games. It does not cover sampling bias or related games (the same players appear many times), so real uncertainty is larger. "How common" = share of all sampled games at that level that reached this position. Ratings are Lichess ratings; they are not interchangeable with Chess.com or FIDE ratings.
Compare it with another choice from the same position, at the Lichess level and time control you choose: Compare in Find Your Opening (the comparison needs JavaScript)
Results by time control
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation games ended in one Lichess time control, across all rating levels combined.
| Time control | Games | White wins | Draws | Black wins | White's score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bullet | 1,706 | 47.4% | 4.2% | 48.4% | 49.5% |
| Blitz | 2,875 | 48.2% | 4.7% | 47.1% | 50.6% |
| Rapid | 677 | 45.8% | 6.2% | 48.0% | 48.9% |
| Classical | 28 | Not enough games in this sample | |||
This table and the rating rows are separate summaries: rating levels are not split by time control here, and time controls are not split by rating. Observed results only; approximate uncertainty applies as above.
Most played replies for White at each level
Top replies with at least 150 games. "Score" is White's score after that reply (wins + half of draws). These comparisons alone can't show that one reply is reliably better — the margins are approximate and stronger or weaker players may prefer different replies.
| Rating level | Reply · share · games · score |
|---|---|
| Under 1200 | Not enough games in this sample |
| 1200–1499 | Not enough games in this sample |
| 1500–1799 |
6.Be3 ·26.0% · 267 · 57.5% ±5.8 6.Bg5 ·20.5% · 210 · 52.4% ±6.6 6.Bc4 ·14.7% · 151 · 52.0% ±7.8 |
| 1800–2099 |
6.Be3 ·35.2% · 667 · 51.0% ±3.7 6.Bc4 ·15.5% · 293 · 45.9% ±5.6 6.Bg5 ·12.2% · 231 · 51.3% ±6.3 |
| 2100+ |
6.Be3 ·49.7% · 945 · 48.5% ±3.1 6.Bc4 ·10.6% · 202 · 51.5% ±6.7 6.Be2 ·9.6% · 182 · 45.6% ±6.9 |
Up next: related positions with a page
- Earlier position: Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 (Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 (Sicilian Defense: French Variation)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 (Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon)
| Opening | Lichess rating level | Games | Black's score |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 | 1500–1799 | 2,758 | 52.9% ±1.8 |
Each row is a separate page with its own games. A difference smaller than the two margins combined is no clear difference. Observed results, not causation.
Deeper positions with this name
The free opening list gives the name Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation to 1 deeper position on this line as well. This page counts the first one; games in the 12-month sample that reached each deeper one:
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Be3: 1,967 games
Download these numbers: Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (CSV), released under CC0. For move-by-move exploration with your own filters, see the free Lichess opening explorer. This independent page lists each rating level and each time control in its own row for comparison.
- Insight pages whose tables include the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation: Most drawish openings
- How the numbers on this page are made: How it works