Openings › Sicilian Defense › Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon
How common by level
Hyperaccelerated Dragon: Win Rate by Lichess Rating
Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon · 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 · CC0 name list
At 1500–1799 (Lichess rating), Black scored 50.1% in 3,276 Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon games (±1.7; games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026).
Black won 48.3% of them, White won 48.0%, and 3.7% were drawn.
No clear difference from 50% at this level (inside the margin)
In games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026, Black scored 50.1% (±1.7) with the Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon in sampled Lichess games at the 1500–1799 Lichess rating level (3,276 games). Observed results, not causation.
Data period: games from 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026 (sample of the Lichess open database) · Page updated: 9 Oct 2026
0.3%
of rated games at Lichess rating 1800–2099 reached the Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon · 3,936 of 1,329,701 games, Oct 2025–Sep 2026 sample
Under 1200: 0.1%. At 1800–2099: 0.3%. 3.7× as common at 1800–2099 as under 1200.
At a glance
- In this sample, White's score ranged from 48.5% (Under 1200) to 50.6% (2100+).
- That spread is within the approximate margin of error, so this sample shows no clear difference between levels.
- It appeared most often in the 2100+ group (0.4% of that group's games).
- Draws were most common in the 2100+ group (5.9%).
These are observed results for the selected games (rated, players within 200 rating points of each other). They describe what happened — they do not prove the opening caused the result.
Results by Lichess rating level
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon games at one rating level ended: White wins, draws and Black wins, across all time controls combined. Rating level is the average Lichess rating of both players.
White won drawn Black won. Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon — results by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined (minimum 300 games per row).
"White's score" = wins + half of draws. "±" is an approximate 95% margin based only on the number of games. It does not cover sampling bias or related games (the same players appear many times), so real uncertainty is larger. "How common" = share of all sampled games at that level that reached this position. Ratings are Lichess ratings; they are not interchangeable with Chess.com or FIDE ratings.
Compare it with another choice from the same position, at the Lichess level and time control you choose: Compare in Find Your Opening (the comparison needs JavaScript)
Results by time control
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon games ended in one Lichess time control, across all rating levels combined.
| Time control | Games | White wins | Draws | Black wins | White's score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bullet | 3,646 | 48.1% | 3.6% | 48.3% | 49.9% |
| Blitz | 6,772 | 47.6% | 4.7% | 47.8% | 49.9% |
| Rapid | 1,878 | 47.0% | 5.4% | 47.6% | 49.7% |
| Classical | 68 | Not enough games in this sample | |||
This table and the rating rows are separate summaries: rating levels are not split by time control here, and time controls are not split by rating. Observed results only; approximate uncertainty applies as above.
Most played replies for White at each level
Top replies with at least 150 games. "Score" is White's score after that reply (wins + half of draws). These comparisons alone can't show that one reply is reliably better — the margins are approximate and stronger or weaker players may prefer different replies.
| Rating level | Reply · share · games · score |
|---|---|
| Under 1200 |
3.Bc4 ·31.9% · 206 · 50.2% ±6.8 3.d4 ·30.8% · 199 · 47.5% ±6.9 |
| 1200–1499 |
3.d4 ·38.6% · 706 · 50.0% ±3.6 3.Bc4 ·30.4% · 556 · 49.3% ±4.1 3.Nc3 ·10.9% · 199 · 53.8% ±6.8 |
| 1500–1799 |
3.d4 ·45.7% · 1,497 · 50.5% ±2.5 3.Bc4 ·23.4% · 767 · 49.0% ±3.5 3.c3 ·12.8% · 420 · 52.1% ±4.7 |
| 1800–2099 |
3.d4 ·54.1% · 2,128 · 49.2% ±2.1 3.c3 ·16.8% · 662 · 49.4% ±3.7 3.Bc4 ·14.0% · 552 · 50.5% ±4.1 |
| 2100+ |
3.d4 ·60.5% · 1,617 · 49.8% ±2.4 3.c3 ·17.5% · 468 · 51.0% ±4.4 3.Bc4 ·6.6% · 177 · 56.2% ±7.0 |
Up next: related positions with a page
- Earlier position: Sicilian Defense 1.e4 c5
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 (Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 (Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 (Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation)
| Opening | Lichess rating level | Games | Black's score |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 | 1500–1799 | 39,118 | 49.0% ±0.5 |
| vs Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 | 1500–1799 | 20,387 | 50.0% ±0.7 |
| vs Sicilian Defense: French Variation 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 | 1500–1799 | 16,443 | 49.6% ±0.8 |
Each row is a separate page with its own games. A difference smaller than the two margins combined is no clear difference. Observed results, not causation.
Deeper positions with this name
The free opening list gives the name Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon to 1 deeper position on this line as well. This page counts the first one; games in the 12-month sample that reached each deeper one:
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 3.d4: 6,296 games
Download these numbers: Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon (CSV), released under CC0. For move-by-move exploration with your own filters, see the free Lichess opening explorer. This independent page lists each rating level and each time control in its own row for comparison.
- Insight pages whose tables include the Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon: Most drawish openings
- How the numbers on this page are made: How it works