Openings › Sicilian Defense › Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation
How common by level
Sicilian Najdorf Variation: Win Rate by Lichess Rating
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation · 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 · CC0 name list
At 1500–1799 (Lichess rating), Black scored 52.9% in 2,758 Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation games (±1.8; games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026).
Black won 51.2% of them, White won 45.5%, and 3.3% were drawn.
Black scores above 50% at this level (outside the margin)
In games from Oct 2025–Sep 2026, Black scored 52.9% (±1.8) with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation in sampled Lichess games at the 1500–1799 Lichess rating level (2,758 games). Observed results, not causation.
Data period: games from 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026 (sample of the Lichess open database) · Page updated: 9 Oct 2026
0.8%
of rated games at Lichess rating 2100+ reached the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation · 5,313 of 689,970 games, Oct 2025–Sep 2026 sample
At 1200–1499: 0.1%. At 2100+: 0.8%. 12.0× as common at 2100+ as at 1200–1499.
At a glance
- In this sample, White's score ranged from 47.1% (1500–1799) to 50.6% (1200–1499).
- That spread is within the approximate margin of error, so this sample shows no clear difference between levels.
- It appeared most often in the 2100+ group (0.8% of that group's games).
- Draws were most common in the 2100+ group (8.1%).
These are observed results for the selected games (rated, players within 200 rating points of each other). They describe what happened — they do not prove the opening caused the result.
Results by Lichess rating level
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation games at one rating level ended: White wins, draws and Black wins, across all time controls combined. Rating level is the average Lichess rating of both players.
White won drawn Black won. Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation — results by Lichess rating level, all time controls combined (minimum 300 games per row).
"White's score" = wins + half of draws. "±" is an approximate 95% margin based only on the number of games. It does not cover sampling bias or related games (the same players appear many times), so real uncertainty is larger. "How common" = share of all sampled games at that level that reached this position. Ratings are Lichess ratings; they are not interchangeable with Chess.com or FIDE ratings.
Compare it with another choice from the same position, at the Lichess level and time control you choose: Compare in Find Your Opening (the comparison needs JavaScript)
Results by time control
Each row shows how the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation games ended in one Lichess time control, across all rating levels combined.
| Time control | Games | White wins | Draws | Black wins | White's score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bullet | 4,333 | 44.6% | 5.0% | 50.5% | 47.0% |
| Blitz | 8,196 | 48.0% | 5.2% | 46.8% | 50.6% |
| Rapid | 1,797 | 46.6% | 6.1% | 47.3% | 49.6% |
| Classical | 102 | Not enough games in this sample | |||
This table and the rating rows are separate summaries: rating levels are not split by time control here, and time controls are not split by rating. Observed results only; approximate uncertainty applies as above.
Most played replies for White at each level
Top replies with at least 150 games. "Score" is White's score after that reply (wins + half of draws). These comparisons alone can't show that one reply is reliably better — the margins are approximate and stronger or weaker players may prefer different replies.
| Rating level | Reply · share · games · score |
|---|---|
| Under 1200 | Not enough games in this sample |
| 1200–1499 | 6.Bg5 ·27.0% · 208 · 51.2% ±6.7 |
| 1500–1799 |
6.Bg5 ·23.1% · 637 · 47.9% ±3.8 6.Be3 ·19.1% · 525 · 45.6% ±4.2 6.Bc4 ·14.0% · 385 · 49.2% ±4.9 |
| 1800–2099 |
6.Bg5 ·21.1% · 1,146 · 51.2% ±2.8 6.Be3 ·20.6% · 1,117 · 50.6% ±2.9 6.Bc4 ·13.0% · 705 · 51.0% ±3.6 |
| 2100+ |
6.Bg5 ·24.0% · 1,274 · 50.7% ±2.7 6.Be3 ·21.1% · 1,122 · 51.3% ±2.7 6.Bc4 ·12.2% · 646 · 52.5% ±3.8 |
Up next: related positions with a page
- Earlier position: Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 (Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 (Sicilian Defense: French Variation)
- Related line: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 (Sicilian Defense: Hyperaccelerated Dragon)
| Opening | Lichess rating level | Games | Black's score |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 | 1500–1799 | 1,025 | 46.5% ±3.0 |
Each row is a separate page with its own games. A difference smaller than the two margins combined is no clear difference. Observed results, not causation.
Deeper positions with this name
The free opening list gives the name Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation to 4 deeper positions on this line as well. This page counts the first one; games in the 12-month sample that reached each deeper one:
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5: 3,311 games
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6: 2,236 games
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4: 1,150 games
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7: 690 games
Download these numbers: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (CSV), released under CC0. For move-by-move exploration with your own filters, see the free Lichess opening explorer. This independent page lists each rating level and each time control in its own row for comparison.
- Insight pages whose tables include the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation: Most drawish openings
- How the numbers on this page are made: How it works